RSS 1.0     RSS 2.0

<< First  < Previous | Page:  4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next >  Last >>
posted:agent0o5
on 04/25/2010 16:44:39


reksmay wrote:

Not explicitly mentioned in that post, is my gratitude for you. Having discerned what I think you meant to say, I have a minor revelation as outlined in that post. That revelation is once again, nonattachment. It gets to be quite a theme for me as I continue to draw breath. It is beautiful. We all want to share what it is that we learn. And, we all don't like it when someone appears to attack our views. But, with nonattachment as the third eye, we can learn to forgive and move on. Life is too short. We can choose to take what we can and leave out what we don't want. That is quite fundamental, and yet highly elusive as often we forget because we tend to cling to things that would burden us in a what appears as an endless journey that requires one to pick up the tools, use them, and discard them when they are no longer needed in order to arrive at the destination victoriously.


I'm not a Buddhist, but I like what Buddha says about attachment and detachment. It's a good idea when debating to detach yourself from your ideas so that you can learn more from differing views, but at the same time, it's not good to just to change your views if that opposing view doesn't do anything to change your own views, ie it's ok to be attached to a view that is 'more' correct. It's just good to see the other side, but sometimes the grass is not greener on the other side. Basically, stand your ground but not be too stubborn, more like finding balance or the middle way (edit: I see why you use the word "nonattachment" now because that is what it is, not attachment and not detachment, a middle ground).

I have a feeling though that most debates end up being about the person rather than the issues because of the attachment of ideas with person(s). Sometimes even debates start intentionally only to talk about a person rather than the issue, but disguised as being about the issues. I don't know about others but I feel like it's a waste of my time when someone ask me to explain my position but not really caring to hear about it? Don't ask if you don't really want to know. I just ignore people who choose to waste my time really... Basically, you also have to discern between those who want to only talk about you to waste your time or those who really care about the issues.





--------------------------------------------------------------
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.
posted:SpicyChick
on 04/25/2010 21:14:06


reksmay wrote:

Not at all, Spicy. There is no drama seen. I am a student above all else. As I choose, everyone's  comments/perspectives are my teachers. Like everyone, I strive to understand people, but especially myself, because understanding helps douse disputes, if any. We all are sentient beings with inumerable struggles. If we can ameliorate such burdens through imparting knowledge/perceptions, it is the greater path to attain.

With a post there appears to be at least two perceptions. One is that I am standing up for you in what appears to be an "attack". As an independent person, I don't think you need someone backing you up as to appear defenseless. Likewise the sentiment, when applied to me. However, I don't think you are defenseless. While it appears as an attack by K15 in those questions, I perceive them as not. I believe it a genuine attempt to understand why you post the things you post. Likewise, myself. I hope you can forgive me, too, as sometimes I make mistakes by not understanding people's posts properly. I think people have similar complaints toward me (ref. JMon who cannot discern that we are but two strangers just colliding in cyberspace and exacerbate matters when I strive to call a truce), so I will keep this in mind.

Not explicitly mentioned in that post, is my gratitude for you. Having discerned what I think you meant to say, I have a minor revelation as outlined in that post. That revelation is once again, nonattachment. It gets to be quite a theme for me as I continue to draw breath. It is beautiful. We all want to share what it is that we learn. And, we all don't like it when someone appears to attack our views. But, with nonattachment as the third eye, we can learn to forgive and move on. Life is too short. We can choose to take what we can and leave out what we don't want. That is quite fundamental, and yet highly elusive as often we forget because we tend to cling to things that would burden us in a what appears as an endless journey that requires one to pick up the tools, use them, and discard them when they are no longer needed in order to arrive at the destination victoriously.



SpicyChick wrote:

Thank you bong srey for standing up for me....I truely appreciate it. But I dont want to bring any dramas to you.

I often make mistakes by not be very reasonable at times. As much as I dislike being attacked and seeing others being attacked, and frequently put myself into say sth, I on the other hand like to thank those who enjoy attacking. Indeed, it gives me a feedbacks that I cannot be too optimistic that my views are solid. It gives me the room to improve as a leaner.

The sarcasm of being passive is that, when I know that I am not wrong, and so many times I see the suttle attacks come up again and again, it tells me that I should shut up and leave (but persistence holds, it teaches me to bend down, and keep cultivating, not to give up so easily, it allows me to reflect my strength and weekness. This is the greatest learning curve in cyberspace for me).

Imagine in real life you are only allowed to repeat a number of mistakes, how great is that if you can utilise online space as another back up? 

One thing I only ask though, Plesae members, regardless of your friends, relatives, or outcasts...hold a faire and reasonable views. Dont judge people so quickly. If we can put personal agendas aside, debate for better resolutions. Respect others like you want to be respected and treated.  Then I see little obstraction of this site future ( I know I should never speak for the owners), by all mean I only want to see unity in khmers.


posted:SpicyChick
on 04/25/2010 21:16:39


khemara15 wrote:


spicychick wrote:
why do I have to agree with what I dont want to agree? why do I have to say the same as others, just because 99% of the members already said? Why can't I choose to be passive, when people are so biased in their characters?

Could you please answer me?


spicychick wrote:
Thank you bong srey for standing up for me...


spcicychick wrote:
I am full of flaws, aggression

Hello spicychick,

Thank you for your reply.

I think you misunderstood my post.

No one is saying that you cannot be passive.

I only wish to know how anyone could "Like being attacked and being passive"? because, as you implied, 99% of the people probably do not like being attacked and many will be not be passive, when attacked.  

Reksmay explained it very well and I thank her for her post.

I was not sure whether you were being serious or sarcastic.

As for my comment about KSaron seeming to like being attacked but yet not being passive, my comment was 100% serious. If you say that


spicychick wrote:
yes Ksaron and I are alike, that's why are friends, see like attract like

Then, I will take your word for it.


Thank you Khemara 15 for taking the time to ask me.


posted:reksmay
on 04/26/2010 14:42:48


agent0o5 wrote:

I'm not a Buddhist, but I like what Buddha says about attachment and detachment. It's a good idea when debating to detach yourself from your ideas so that you can learn more from differing views, but at the same time, it's not good to just to change your views if that opposing view doesn't do anything to change your own views, ie it's ok to be attached to a view that is 'more' correct. It's just good to see the other side, but sometimes the grass is not greener on the other side. Basically, stand your ground but not be too stubborn, more like finding balance or the middle way (edit: I see why you use the word "nonattachment" now because that is what it is, not attachment and not detachment, a middle ground).

That is the trick---to be aware enough to accept things as they are and free self from much suffering due to unnecessary attachment. This is Equanimity and Nonattachment at play. It seems one has to look at multifacets of the same thing for an object/idea does not exist unilaterally to perhaps arrive closer at the truth. It is difficult to look at things as a whole as it is far easier to focus our attention. Hence, we tend to choose a major in college. Although Buddhism, especially the 8-Fold Path, breaks everything into steps, one has to loop them somehow together to perhaps perceive the hidden truth under our nose. That is most difficult.

Perhaps reinforcing your conclusion, I believe that it is more worthwhile to have a plethora of diverse ideas and opinions because that is where the learning is. It is the challenges that teach a person, not the mundaneness of things. I value a person's set of ideas and would not appreciate it if they change their view simply because of what is said online, but if that person comes to his/her own realization personally. A simile is like the grass undulating in the wind. If the wind blows from the East, naturally one bends to the West and so on and so forth. There is no concrete root to a person. I believe a person's foundation may be shaky due to his/her lack of understanding of what it is that he/she believes in. However moving forward, growth cannot occur if one has one set of understanding without considering a different understanding from various sources of stimulation.

Personally, I assert myself in various "debates" (more like argument than debates) to learn about how I think and how others think. The mind is like any other organ of your body, only it is most important. If one does not exercise it, it gets weakened and becomes useless. In accordance of what you said, realization is dependent on many factors and not just the other person's ideas/thoughts carelessly/carefully thrown out in cyberspace at all. All of us are too set on a certain idea since the moment of birth. To change opinion of other is most difficult. To change one's own opinion of things, even greater.

 


Agent wrote:
I have a feeling though that most debates end up being about the person rather than the issues because of the attachment of ideas with person(s). Sometimes even debates start intentionally only to talk about a person rather than the issue, but disguised as being about the issues. I don't know about others but I feel like it's a waste of my time when someone ask me to explain my position but not really caring to hear about it? Don't ask if you don't really want to know. I just ignore people who choose to waste my time really... Basically, you also have to discern between those who want to only talk about you to waste your time or those who really care about the issues.

The internet is both a time killer as well as a place of resource for me. I feel my energy is quite dispersed enough as it is. Therefore, I strive to focus on only a few media. I feel people's times are valuable as well and usually give them the benefit of a doubt. I would give them the honor they deserve unless proven otherwise.




--------------------------------------------------------------
Is time the wheel that turns, or the track it leaves behind?
posted:khemara15
on 04/26/2010 19:41:47


SpicyChick wrote:

Thank you Khemara 15 for taking the time to ask me.

You are welcome, SpicyChick. 


posted:khemara15
on 04/26/2010 19:42:19


n1985 wrote:
Well that was a really heart-felt philosophical bullshit from a 2 face anonymous hiding behind the keyboard in the comfort of his own home.


n1985 wrote:
Excellent analysis 12angrymen; I found myself nodding in many of your points throughout this thread. Thumbs up!

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=2

Hi n1985,

I wonder whether 12AngryMen is also a Kwitiker and what his/her screen name is.

S/he is a knowledgeable and capable debater, IMO.

On the other hand, KW also needs someone like Antiquated.

In this thread

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=0

,s/ he has done a half-decent job of defending Hun Sen and the CPP regime and so far, has not resorted to any personal attack. 


posted:agent0o5
on 04/26/2010 21:12:05



khemara15 wrote:

I wonder whether 12AngryMen is also a Kwitiker and what his/her screen name is.

S/he is a knowledgeable and capable debater, IMO.

On the other hand, KW also needs someone like Antiquated.

In this thread

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=0

,s/ he has done a half-decent job of defending Hun Sen and the CPP regime and so far, has not resorted to any personal attack. 



KC needs someone as knowledgeable as khemara15 and the rest of KW politics members. Politics is completely dead in KC except a few in chatterbox once in awhile.

Then we'll have the best of both worlds "fun" threads and "serious fun" threads.




--------------------------------------------------------------
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.
posted:steungsongkae
on 04/27/2010 01:59:44


khemara15 wrote:



n1985 wrote:
Well that was a really heart-felt philosophical bullshit from a 2 face anonymous hiding behind the keyboard in the comfort of his own home.


n1985 wrote:
Excellent analysis 12angrymen; I found myself nodding in many of your points throughout this thread. Thumbs up!

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=2

Hi n1985,

I wonder whether 12AngryMen is also a Kwitiker and what his/her screen name is.

S/he is a knowledgeable and capable debater, IMO.

On the other hand, KW also needs someone like Antiquated.

In this thread

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=0

,s/ he has done a half-decent job of defending Hun Sen and the CPP regime and so far, has not resorted to any personal attack. 




Yes, Antiquated is doing an excellent job(not half-decent job) there in pointing out the obviousness of what a county need and priority in moving forward. Is she/he also a retard, in your book?


khemara15 wrote:

has not resorted to any personal attack.


The keyword here is self examination and self reflection...

Sometimes, self examination and self reflection is so important in one's journey to self discovery and thus self assurance that one is not what one hate. And that somehow we can find our way back to being objective...



posted:khemara15
on 04/27/2010 02:05:22


agent0o5 wrote:
KC needs someone as knowledgeable as khemara15 and the rest of KW politics members

Hi agent 0o5,

You are very kind.

Speaking for myself, although, in my near-5 years there, I never had any trouble with kc or any of its moderators but once I made the decision to leave kc as a poster (but remain an intermittent reader) and join KW, there is no going back.

Even if ALL the other KW Politics posters were to leave KW en masse and rejoin kc (which I read is merging with another site) or join another site, I will stay here on my own, even if it means having no one to talk to.


agent0o5 wrote:
Politics is completely dead in KC except a few in chatterbox once in awhile. http://www.khmerwitica.com/file/smile/biggrin.gif

Yes, it’s so amazing that a thread

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=0

started by KLB in the Chatterbox blossomed into quite an interesting thread.

I doubt that this will happen again for quite some time.

Even if I was still a kc poster, 12 AngryMen is doing such a good job as a CPP regime critic that I would not have jumped in, anyway.

The last thing I would have wanted is to add to the perception that CPP regime critics are ganging up on the few pro-stability defenders.


posted:reksmay
on 04/29/2010 01:34:17

That thread is quite an enlightening thread. I absolutely commend both parties as mentioned below. Both parties strive to stick to the topic, but I fear the feelings of Anti-HS have gone so high that some members are resorting to personal attacks. That is not good. Insults notwithstanding, I appreciate the education it offers and can only commend those who are not bent under pressure, but work with the issues, rationally and logically based on the available evidences at their disposal through various media/sources.


khemara15 wrote:


...12AngryMen...

S/he is a knowledgeable and capable debater, IMO.

Antiquated...

,s/ he has done a half-decent job of defending Hun Sen and the CPP regime and so far, has not resorted to any personal attack. 

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=0





--------------------------------------------------------------
Is time the wheel that turns, or the track it leaves behind?
posted:khemara15
on 04/29/2010 02:05:25


reksmay wrote:
but I fear the feelings of Anti-HS have gone so high that some members are resorting to personal attacks. That is not good.

Hi reksmay,

IMO, I don’t think this comment made by n1985


n1985 wrote:
Excellent analysis 12angrymen; I found myself nodding in many of your points throughout this thread. Thumbs up!

Deserved the following comment.


samo wrote:
all you could do is nod like a good puppy would do

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=2

IMO, one of the reasons why n1985 did not respond to what is clearly an insult has to do with this comment from 12AngryMen


12AngryMen wrote:
why do you need to resort to personal attacks. he isn't even saying anything about you. why don't you stick to the topic and not the person that is disagreeing with your views. 

I am not so sure about who have resorted to personal attacks first, one of the so-called anti-HS or one of the HS defenders/apologists. 

As for anti-HS feelings running high, I sense a growing frustration over the arguments presented by the HS defenders/apologists.

I give 12AngryMen credit not only for his/her knowledge and rhetoric but also for his/her patience. IMO, now that the thread has reached 5 pages, "the twain won't meet" and one or two personal attacks are all that is needed for that thread to degenerate into a personal exchange and for that thread to be locked and a few posters to be warned and possibly banned.

Still, since kc has not had this kind of political debate for quite some time, the thread is certainly interesting. 



posted:reksmay
on 04/29/2010 11:57:00

Hi K15,

Allow me to correct myself. “I fear the feelings of Anti-HS and HS defenders/apologists have gone so high that some members from both sides are resorting to personal attacks. That is not good.”

Yes, I do agree that the harsh comment made toward N1985 by Samo was not diplomatically done nor is it appropriate as to stir unnecessary feelings of strife for the insult it intended. However, 12AM responded justly to him with respect to that comment.

I acknowledge the growing frustrations from both sides, but to be fair to Antiquated he/she is quite reserved in response in observance of patience similarly. Such patience I attribute to logic and reason based upon whatever resources at his/her exposure, or confined by his/her extent of the world at large and no more. That is as expected of anyone to go about a case with step by step reasoning and logic and deduction. With 12AM, likewise.

To reiterate, I enjoy reading everybody's comments, insults nothwitstanding. It is a lively thread and quite enlightening in various ways. I hope it will continue to go on for however long it must to run out of steam naturally and not through a few wise mouths causing it to be locked. I am marveled at how engaging politics is and have grown to appreciate it more. It is a shame for me that I have mostly ignore it all this time.




khemara15 wrote:


reksmay wrote:
but I fear the feelings of Anti-HS have gone so high that some members are resorting to personal attacks. That is not good.

Hi reksmay,

IMO, I don’t think this comment made by n1985


n1985 wrote:
Excellent analysis 12angrymen; I found myself nodding in many of your points throughout this thread. Thumbs up!

Deserved the following comment.


samo wrote:
all you could do is nod like a good puppy would do

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=2

IMO, one of the reasons why n1985 did not respond to what is clearly an insult has to do with this comment from 12AngryMen


12AngryMen wrote:
why do you need to resort to personal attacks. he isn't even saying anything about you. why don't you stick to the topic and not the person that is disagreeing with your views. 

I am not so sure about who have resorted to personal attacks first, one of the so-called anti-HS or one of the HS defenders/apologists. 

As for anti-HS feelings running high, I sense a growing frustration over the arguments presented by the HS defenders/apologists.

I give 12AngryMen credit not only for his/her knowledge and rhetoric but also for his/her patience. IMO, now that the thread has reached 5 pages, "the twain won't meet" and one or two personal attacks are all that is needed for that thread to degenerate into a personal exchange and for that thread to be locked and a few posters to be warned and possibly banned.

Still, since kc has not had this kind of political debate for quite some time, the thread is certainly interesting. 





--------------------------------------------------------------
Is time the wheel that turns, or the track it leaves behind?
posted:n1985
on 04/29/2010 15:06:14

Hey K15, I don't usually interfere in an online debate. But the nature of this issue is not just about political realm, it also affects the lives and the livelihood of Cambodians thus it concerns me. People need to critically understand the facts and truth in order to have rational judgement and not become influence by a notion with little thought. I always welcome any proponent of the CPP regime as long as they able to logically lay out their points in a factual manner.




--------------------------------------------------------------
EVERYONE BOW DOWN AND PAY EXTREME HOMAGE TO HIS MAJESTIES: n0_0™
posted:n1985
on 04/29/2010 15:12:02

And oh that Samo khmer poser, I publicly humiliated him in 2 occassion and apparently still bitter about it, lol.




--------------------------------------------------------------
EVERYONE BOW DOWN AND PAY EXTREME HOMAGE TO HIS MAJESTIES: n0_0™
posted:khemara15
on 04/29/2010 19:32:11


n1985 wrote:
And oh that Samo khmer poser, I publicly humiliated him in 2 occassion and apparently still bitter about it, lol.

Now, I understand. LOL


reksmay wrote:
Yes, I do agree that the harsh comment made toward N1985 by Samo was not diplomatically done nor is it appropriate as to stir unnecessary feelings of strife for the insult it intended

As if the first insult was not enough,


samo wrote:
as for n_n1985 he can s.u.k his own pen.is

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=12&t=53921&o=3

And not a word from the moderator?

kc has certainly changed.

Maybe, it aspires to be the KW of yesteryear. LOL


09/10/2010
<< First  < Previous | Page:  4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next >  Last >>