BLOGS   WRITE NEW BLOG   EDIT BLOGS  
 
RSS
From the very top down
Posted On 12/12/2007 17:32:17 by Cambodia

Robbing the poor to become richer and richer and the underlying mentality



Jomreang wrote in



http://www.myp1t.com/public/forum/posts/id_535/page_2/post_reply/quote_4950/

Heavy traffic of tourism in Siem Riep have boosted the local economy enormously of course, but the ones who benifit from this economy are not the poor khmer people in the area. They have been chased off their home and their lands by the rich. Their cannot place food stands to make sales for daily living where they used to. Their food stands have been replaced by fancy restaurants owned by the rich and the powerful. While a few top national leaders benefit from renting Angkorwat to foreigners, a few top local leaders benefit from the development of new hotels, restaurants, and resorts surrounding Angkorwat sites after chasing away the poor from their lands.

The Cambodian government and its supporters boast about the country’s economic growth but, unlike Jomreang, make no mention of the underside of this growth.

Looting the country’s resources



On the 16th anniversary of the 1991 Paris Peace Accords, Simon Taylor wrote



http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/simon_taylor/2007/10/the_price_of_peace.html


On paper, Cambodia's natural resources and state assets - the land, forests, minerals and heritage sites - were the basis for kickstarting the post-conflict economy. The revenue generated should have gone towards poverty alleviation and rebuilding infrastructure. Instead, systematic and institutionalised corruption has deprived the entire population of the revenue that could have come from these public goods.


(a) the forests

A cursory glance at today's Cambodian business sector reveals the country's forests, land, mining, ports, national buildings and casinos to be predominantly controlled by a handful of government-affiliated tycoons or family members of senior political figures. Information about deals is not made available to the Cambodian people to whom the state's resources belong. Similarly, consultation with local populations dependent upon forests or land is often non-existent. For many Cambodians, the first they know is the sound of a chainsaw revving or a bulldozer arriving to flatten their crops.
Cambodia's forests are a case in point. In the 1990s they were described by the World Bank as the country's "most developmentally important resource". Today they are largely degraded, having been sold off over the years by the political elite to private companies or individuals intent on logging as much as possible to turn a quick buck. Most of the vast wealth
generated has not reached the national coffers: instead it appears to have been siphoned off into the private bank accounts of the loggers and their political patrons.

For evidence of all of the above, please click



http://www.globalwitness.org/media_library.php?campaign_id=67&filter=reports_documents&ml_lang=en


(b) the heritage sites and other natural resources



Since 2003, Sokha Beach in Kompong Som has been a private beach and off-limits to outsiders. It was ceded as a concession to Sokimex owned by Sok Kong, a personal friend of Hun Sen’s. Without any tendering process, Sokimex has also been awarded the ticket concession to Angkor. Likewise, the Bokor mountain site and the Olympic Stadium in Phnom Penh, all without any tendering process.

The Hun Sen-Sok Kong dealings are the most well-known and “in your face” non-transparent examples of the process I labeled as “Robbing the poor to become richer and richer”. Most are not so well-known.

© the land grabs



Hun Sen pretends to complain about these but the fact is that his own relatives and cronies are the worst offenders.

Since land prices are skyrocketing, the pace of land grabbing has accelerated.

The way the rich and powerful people in Cambodia conduct their political and business affairs is consistent with the way they behave toward common people.

Sure, politicians will touch flesh and speak the voters’ language (ref. Hun Sen), especially at election time but, their minds, poor people are sub-humans, dumb and dirty.

The thinking is “Their virginal daughters are good for deflowering, the prettiest ones make excellent trophy mistresses, the famous entertainers are notches on one's belt like the latest model SUVs but any son of ours is better dead than marrying one of these Kdam Sre. What a thought! Can you imagine anything so ridiculous”. Never mind the fact that most of these Angkareaks have exactly the same background as the poor people they despise.

Class consciousness has been pervasive throughout Cambodian society for a long time but, nowadays, the level of meanness, stinginess and disdain toward the poor has reached heights that made the noblesse oblige mentality of pre-1975 Cambodia look enlightened.

The condescending attitude toward waiters, waitresses, people who don’t dress well, people who arrive on motorbikes

http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=13&t=5641

or off motor taxis is only the tip of the iceberg.

Given the mentality I described in the previous paragraphs, is it any wonder that there is no hesitation or shame in grabbing everything for oneself and who cares about everybody else and especially people who are subhuman anyway?




Bookmark:



Viewing 1 - 20 out of 22 Comments


Page:  1 | 2 | Next >  Last >>

From: blackcoffee
01/27/2008 22:47:02

Batman has lost it, where are you Robin?



From: khmernutz
12/17/2007 13:34:21
The battle lines have been drawn. Now, lets fight!


From: Cambodia
12/16/2007 16:12:50

Because KSaron's "the Big Picture" blog may disappear from the home page quickly, I am posting here the link to his blog

http://www.myp1t.com/blog/view/id_268/ 



From: Cambodia
12/16/2007 16:06:06

AhMom, My main point is that, over the past two years, many Khmers have become more and more obsessed with land prices and money and, as a result, Cambodia has changed for the worse. My first few columns are about the mentality. In response to your question, I would like to see rice farmers keep their rice fields and continue farming OR if they sell their rice fields, to use the proceeds to start a business. I did not look at things in black-and-white terms like your Options A and B.


From: KSaron
12/16/2007 03:50:35
The picture has been painted.


From: KSaron
12/15/2007 21:51:51
I'm still trying to paint the big picture.  give me a little more time.  I want my painting to be clear of what I see.


From: ahmom
12/15/2007 18:30:47
As an example of how Cambodia in the past few years have changed for the worse you note land prices have gone up and some people are benefiting from that phenomenon. Some newly rich and have-been rich-for-a-long-time people show their true characters by looking down on those who are poorer than them. Let us say that these things are true. So Bong, we have two options here: Option A: all people are still poor. Option B: some people are richer, some people are still poor. Tell me which is better? Is this really an example of Cambodia really changing for the worse?



From: khemara15
12/15/2007 18:08:00

Hello Ahmom,

Seng Theary (and maybe you) was looking at today's Cambodia  cf. pre-UNTAC Cambodia.

Ref. my hello column, I was looking at cambodia for the past few years, hence Navy's comment that my view about Cambodia seems to have changed since 2002 and she is right, if anything, I am now more pessimistic because I am even starting to be skeptical  about the inherent goodness of many of the Khmers.

I stand by my assertion that, IMO, in the past few years, Cambodian society has changed for the worse.  



From: ahmom
12/15/2007 17:55:50
Bong, I would be very interested in hearing your response regarding "Saying that not all changes have been positive is a very different thing than saying Cambodia has changed for the worse." And I can hardly wait to read Bong Saron's big picture response.


From: khemara15
12/15/2007 17:50:27

Hello AhMom,

Thank you for your feedback.

I will be debating possible solutions or lack of in future columns.

As for the comparison with tabloids, I guess that my readers for the last five years must know how to mix their reading of my posts with  comic relief in  the Chatterbox and  fun  things in their lives.
. LOL

To be honest, I don't know what's in the tabloids because, all my life, I have never read any.

In the past five years, I have applauded the contribution of certain individuals and organizations to the Cambodian people and will continue to do so in myP1t.  

On the issue of peace, like many others, I am still waiting for Ksaron's input on the big picture.  LOL



From: ahmom
12/15/2007 17:28:39
Saying that not all changes have been positive is a very different thing than saying Cambodia has changed for the worse. I think the single most positive thing so far for Cambodia is peace. OK so we still face a lot of social ills as a country emerging from decades of wars and poverty, but peace is not only an enormous benefit for the people but something that can pave ways for other good things that can happen. With any changes not all things are going to be positive really like they say we can’t have it all. Bong K15, when you write about Cambodia and what’s current, it is absolutely fantastic to write as a critic the way you have been, but at the same time please try to offer some solutions or mention good changes along with the problems. That way our readers will be challenged to want to be a part of the change. Or at least will be thinking about it. Do you know why the tabloids sell? They include some nonsense stories about celeb lives, who hooks up with who, who breaks up with who, etc. In the end people rather read or hear something fun or silly than depressing all the times.

Another point I want to touch on is that some of the societal problems in Cambodia have been there since who know when, just that with modern technology words get spread much faster and much further. Who blogs back in the days after Pol Pot’s?



From: khemara15
12/14/2007 17:42:50
According to Seng Theary
http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2007/12/seng-theary-older-generation-in.html

Cambodia's Changes Not All Positive, Rights Leader Says

By Poch Reasey, VOA Khmer
Original report from Washington
14 December 2007
Cambodia has changed greatly since first elections were held in 1993, nearly 15 years later, not all those changes have been positive, a rights activist said Thursday.

Cambodians do enjoy more freedoms than they did before the UN-sponsored elections, and their access to information is better, but problems like human trafficking, AIDS and the theft of land have followed, said Seng Theary, executive director of the Center for Social Development.

"For example, Cambodia has a big problem with human trafficking that did not exist before Untac," she said. "Now that the infrastructure is better, the rich people can go out to the countryside and grab the poor people's land."


From: KSaron
12/13/2007 14:03:19
ahmom,  we will discuss about the big picture at a later time. 


From: ahmom
12/13/2007 10:21:46
Bong Saron, enlighten those of us who miss the big the picture here. Thanks.


From: KSaron
12/13/2007 02:29:47

Khemara, thank you for take my Angie of the hook...  I look forward to read more.


As for the letter from Andy, he is right about a lot of things.  he is right about our history.  He is right about our people, we are always smiling no matter how dark things are.  He is right about how far we have come but just like many foreigners he failed to see the big picture.  But its not his fault because even most Khmer have failed as well.  I will leave it there for now.  Carry on my friend.



From: khemara15
12/12/2007 23:08:04

Hello KSaron,

No, I do not blame your Angie. LOL

Your comments on my columns add new angles and nuances that are very valid and interesting. Thank you.



From: Cambodia
12/12/2007 23:00:24



Thank you, AhMom, for taking the time to reply.
Nowadays, many high schools in the countryside are finding parking space for more and more motorcycles while, just a few years ago, they were not that many. Is this a sign that things are getting better in cambodia? if you say that it is and are comparing everything how things were during the Pol Pot period and during the 1980s, then we are on different wave lengths.
Thank you for sharing Andy Brouwer's letter to you with us.
All I can say is this. I think one needs to be Khmer to really understand what I have been trying to say in my first few columns. For example, he writes
the resurgence of the Buddhist faith with a massive building project of new Buddhist pagodas.

If building new and bigger (and more and more kitsch) pagodas is the sign of a stronger Buddhist faith, then I guess Cambodia must be becoming a more and more Buddhist country then.
If that’s the case, I don’t know why people worship the Almighty Dollar more and more strongly.
I would have thought that more and more pagodas are being built as a result of population growth and bigger Kathins from rich sponsors from the cities or from abroad. I would not want to guess the real motivation of those annual Tray Leak sponsors because that's another issue altogether.

Furthermore, I am sure that, nowadays, Andy would definitely not want to upset his employer (Hanuman) by writing the way I do. After all, good-paying jobs in an exciting industry like tourism in a booming country like Cambodia (which I know he adores) are not easy to find. LOL



From: Cambodia
12/12/2007 21:45:10
The following is Ah Mom's comment on my previous column which I took the liberty to post here because it seems to address this column head-on.

From: ahmom
12/12/2007 20:39:55

OK so we have a bunch of nutcases and their buddies running the country by exhausting the country’s natural resources and enjoying power and wealth from the blood and sweat of the poor. A truly democratic and capable leadership is very much needed if big changes were going to happen. The question remains: Has Cambodia changed for the better since sakmai ah pot? It certainly has in my view. Growing up in the early 1980’s like many of my friends, I walked barefooted to school six days a week. Without shoes we really didn’t like walking on the new blacktop roads because under the hot sun they could easily burn our little feet. Having traveled to many provinces for a period of about 5 years in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s I witnessed that fewer kids are walking to school barefoot. For me I look for little things like that and I see better days ahead. I believe I will have abundant opportunities to write about more little positive things about Srok Khmer as to balance things out.

What do all action movies have in common? Well, the good guys win. I know some of guys are going to tell me to keep daydreaming if you know what I mean…. Now allow me to share a positive perspective from an English man. Andy (http://www.andybrouwer.co.uk/) once wrote a letter to me, he called it: Good news from Cambodia. He didn’t ignore the problems our people face nor the reality of their lives but he has a lot of good things to say about better days ahead. He was very impressed by what he saw as the cheerful and warm nature of most Khmers and was confident that things will keep getting better for such good-hearted people.

Andy wrote:

Hello Ah Mom,

I hope there's a lot of material on my website about the positive things I've enjoyed when visiting Cambodia, whether it be the people I've met in all four corners of the country or the hope for a better life that many of them have shared with me. The welcome I've received and the invites to share their food and their homes has always been a very positive feature of my visits to your country.

For a country which has endured so much pain and suffering for the last 30 years, much of it at the hands of invading countries or from monsters within their own people, cambodia is looking forward to the 21st century with renewed optimism based largely on two things that have been sadly missing for many years, peace and tourism.

The end of the civil war with the Khmer rouge means that Cambodia is at peace with itself for the first time in over a quarter of a century. There are still many problems to erase such as a degree of lawlessness on odd occasions (like the burning of the Thai embassy recently) and the almost automatic reaction of a few to turn to violence as a way to solve their problems and fears. However, against that, the rise of human rights organisations and the resurgence of the Buddhist faith with a massive building project of new buddhist pagodas, the work of local NGOs in dealing with HIV, orphans, abused wives, the disabled alongside the international NGOs dealing with similar concerns as well as landmine clearance amongst a myriad of other issues. The Cambodian government has been largely stable since the coup of 1997 and though Hun Sen and his government are not universally liked for various reasons (Hun Sen was a Khmer Rouge cadre when younger) they have at least kept Cambodia on an even keel and for some, brought a degree of prosperity (mostly those in the cities). However, don't think that the average Cambodian who lives in the countryside is much better off. Whilst health care and schooling for some will have improved, many still exist below the poverty line and not much has changed for them for many years as they eke out a living from the land. But at least they have confidence brought about by peace and a positive outlook and a hope that their life will change for the better. I think that believing and hoping things will get better has improved their lives, if not in reality then mentally.

My many excursions into the Cambodian countryside have been rewarded with such a degree of warmth that its clear that the normal spirit of Cambodians is to be welcoming and friendly. That is their tendency. Its not to embrace war and violence at all. Most have some Buddhist teachings to fall back on and this turns them from violence. Instead they have welcomed me with open arms into their communities, their homes and to share their food and their water on numerous occasions, and have not required anything in return. This makes me so humble that a people with so little are prepared to share so much - this is not how the western world would react in similar circumstances. They have suffered at the hands of foreigners in the past, whether that's the French or Americans or other countries, but that is all forgotten in the welcoming smile and open arms that one experiences.

Many villages I have arrived at have not seen a westerner before, certainly not one that has come purely to meet them. The welcome from the children of these villages is one of the many highlights of my visits to Cambodia. They are incredibly friendly and playful and want nothing more than to laugh and smile, to play games, to make silly faces and to enjoy the company of someone who looks and sounds very different from themselves. Whilst I cannot speak much Cambodian I can play games, either football, tot sey, volleyball, sandal-throwing or lot antak, and this helps immediately to break down any barriers with children and adults alike. I have also visited orphanages where the love that these children are willing to give is overwhelming and heartrending. Cambodia is at peace and long may it continue. The people are not in fear for their lives anymore though life is not much easier than it has been since time began.

Tourism is another positive, good news item that is affecting Cambodia in a big way. The number of tourists visiting Cambodia has shot through the roof in the last 5 years. The peace and open borders policy has enabled many tourists to come to Cambodia cheaply and with such an incredible ancient culture to show off, Cambodia is embracing tourism in full. Those that are involved in it are increasing their wealth substantially. There is a knock-on to others along the chain, though I would still like to see the whole country benefiting and not just a select few. The temples of Angkor Wat are magnificent. The ancient Khmer culture is fascinating to westerners and fellow Asians. And Cambodia is now taking advantage after many years when these temples and this culture were hidden from foreign eyes by civil war. Much of the country's tourism is aimed at the triangle of Angkor, Phnom Penh and Sihanoukville, but I have found many other places in Cambodia that in a few years will also benefit from the arrival of tourists. And this spread of wealth will be vital to ensure that the remainder of Cambodia does not fall too far behind those areas currently basking in the tourism boom. Already travelers are breaking out from the triangle to discover these new places but the numbers are still very small.

Whether a tourist buys a souvenir or a drink or a coconut, then every little helps. I make sure that on my trips I stop often and buy something from a road stall here or a market stall there. The interaction with the people is part of the pleasure of travelling through this marvelous country and I encourage others who visit Cambodia to take the opportunity to get off the beaten track and see the real Cambodia for yourself, away from the tourist hordes and souvenir stalls.

I see much hope for the people of Cambodia. All their ills of the last 30 years will not disappear overnight. There is still much to do to bring the country into the 21st century but a start has been made and that's what's so important. Governments will come and go but the positiveness of the people, the inherent warmth and gentleness I have found will win in the end and whilst not everyone will experience change for the better, its what's in their hearts that really matters, and I believe that the Cambodian heart is a good one.

Best wishes,
Andy


From: KSaron
12/12/2007 20:53:55

A society of dependability. Those richie rich need the poor to get aid and to look down upon and the poor need the rich for motivation, to become like them. 


The problem with khmer society is that we loss our morals (most) and that once we get to the top we forget who we were.


As for HS family, the reason they are where they are is because they got those abroad to support their action because they see them as the savior.  HS is beyond king of Cambodia and the people abroad made him become god, untouchable.  God will get away with anything.


Khemara, you blame my girl AJ but I blame those that support the god that kills the land.  I  blame those that help kill my country by accepting the lesser evil



From: khemara15
12/12/2007 19:47:52

From there, it is one easy step to drink and drive like a maniac or race cars, kill and maim people in the process when you know you can get away with murder (ref. Hun Sen’s nephew a few years ago and every single day all over Cambodia).

In all traffic accidents, drive on even if the motorcycle is still underneath your car. The chances of getting caught are slim because witnesses are too scared of revenge to give chase.

If caught after a drink and drive accident, bribe the cops, the judges and pay the victims’ families. It’s only money, after all. And money comes so easily.

Who are these victims, anyway? They are not parents of starving children, bread-winners supporting their families in the countryside. They are like dogs, pigs or other animals you run over when you are in a hurry to get to the beach in Kompong Som, to the tasty crab lunch at Kep. Why are all these motorcyclists preventing me from getting to the nearest night club or getting home after a night of carousing and drinking?


--
Page:  1 | 2 | Next >  Last >>